'¿Ö ¼º°æ¸¸À¸·Î ¾È µÉ±î?'
'±×·¯¸é ¿ì¸®´Â ¾î¶»°Ô »ì °ÍÀΰ¡?'¸¦ °í¹ÎÇÒ ¶§~
'»îÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì¿Í ÅëÀϼº'À» ¾Ë¾Æ¾ß ÇÒ ¶§ÀÔ´Ï´Ù~click

"But when he [John the Baptist] saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance: And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham" (Matt. 3:7-9)

"Therefore say I [Christ, Son of God] unto you [the chief priests, elders, scribes, and people of "the Jews"] The kingdom of God [the Yahweh Covenants] shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." (Matt. 21:43)

The champions of the Talmud accuse Hippolytus and others who understand the deeper significance of the Jewish Problem of hatred and an obsessive belief that "the Jews" were receiving and would continue to receive God's punishment for having murdered Jesus understanding nothing of their own spiritual decline. Hippolytus alluded to the fateful event in the story of the Crucifixion when the Roman soldiers cruelly mocked the dying Jesus by offering him the sponge of vinegar (Matt. 27:48; Luke 23: 36). Understanding that at this most momentous event in human history, the eugenic imperative put in place by Yahweh was replaced by the new Blood Covenant for all mankind.

The chosen people of Yahweh were the Judahites whose bloodline played a crucial part in the outer ritual of the Crucifixion but because of Christ's triumph over Evil on the Cross at Cavalry this special status was removed from them. This annulment of the First Covenant - the original Abrahamic Covenant - was signalled by an event in the Herodian Temple (the temple modelled after the original, destroyed Temple of Solomon and so is often called the "Second Solomon's Temple") when:

"... the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent" (Matt. 27:51).

This was the fateful time when Christ as God-come-to-Earth (and at the very moment when Jesus "give up the Ghost" while still hanging on The Cross) supernaturally entered the Temple filled with worshippers during the annual sacrifice for the sins of the Israel and ripped the curtain separating the Holy Place from the Holy of Holies. The worshippers who witnessed the ripping of the curtain that threw open the Holy of Holies were filled with shock, awe and fear; for, they feared death, since they knew that no one could enter the Holy of Holies and live, except for the High Priest, and he but once a year. Yet, this tearing the curtain in two was Christ's signal that the First Covenant (together with its Temple and Levitical priesthood) was now irrelevant and made void and was now replaced by the Second Covenant through Him.

Thus, the writer to the Hebrews was unequivocal on this matter, that the Covenant of Christ completely abolished the First Covenant, of which the "Second Solomon's Temple" and its priesthood were intrinsic parts:

"If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law" (Heb 7:11)

Here is made clear and plain that Christ as God-come-to-Earth considered the First Covenant not only defective but also in dire need of replacement. Consequently, this ringing of the changes, this rescinding of the First Covenant, brought about the change in priesthood and the Law concerning the priesthood. That is, Christ as God-come-to-Earth had not only abolished the ancient priesthood, He had also abolished the Temple as well. Again, the writer of Hebrews relays knowledge of this new and infinitely better Covenant:

"By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament" (Heb. 7:22)

That is, in keeping with the oath's greater strength and force Christ became the Guarantor of a better and stronger agreement with the whole of humanity: a more excellent and more advantageous covenant - the Second Covenant - that benefits mankind in its entirety and not a certain tribe in particular. Again, Hebrews emphasises this new reality:

"In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away" (Heb. 8:13)

That is, if the second is "new," the first must be "old"; that the new covenant makes the first one obsolete and what is obsolete and annulled because of age is ripe for disappearance and to be dispensed with altogether. A new reality when Christ removed from the Israelites and especially the Judahites their special status as the Chosen People of Yahweh concretised in the Abrahamic Covenant.

For, here was the time when Christ had assumed from Yahweh control of human destiny.

Thus, the First Covenant, the Abrahamic Covenant, the Old Yahweh Covenant made between Yahweh and the Israelites was annulled by the momentous event at Calvary when Christ was Crucified on the Cross. So too was destroyed the special status of the Temple and its priesthood by the vastly superior Second Covenant and through its new and infinitely superior High Priest who is Christ. Therefore, the Solomon and Herodian Temples (the First and Second Temples together with their priesthoods) are wholly ignored by genuine Christians except in the proper understanding of the Old Testament Covenant. That is, in the history of Christianity, Solomon's Temple is merely an interesting piece of antiquity.

Unfortunately, this establishment of the Second Covenant and the removal of the special status from the Israelites was ignored by "the Jews." That is, the Modern Tribe of Jews who arrogated the ancient Abrahamic Covenant and convinced themselves and a great many others that they were indeed the "Jews" of the Bible and were heir to special status of "the Jews." That these usurpers were beyond compare, the "crown of Creation", for they verily believed, and were taught by their elders, that they were indeed "God's Chosen People."

Thus the Yahweh Consciousness that was once the greatest vehicle of good on Earth was arrogated and corrupted by Evil and ultimately became a vehicle of tragedy and Evil. And moreover, the usurpation of the Abrahamic Covenant, the vainglorious posturing and the "small portion of vinegar and gall" brought down this fearful Providence upon the Modern Tribe of Jews, which is the cause of the present spiritual condition of World Jewry and the myriad troubles it finds itself in.

The fact of their culpability in Christ's Crucifixion, their spiritual blindness and the posturing of the Jews are compounded by their mischief in all nations they settle. These are the exoteric reasons for the negative reactions arising in the hearts of Christians through the centuries and not the crass "hate" or "anti-Semitism" labels pinned to these ancient defenders of the Faith by devious modern minds.

This rancour and hate towards those who point out the obvious - that the special status of the Judahite is no more, and that the impostors, "the Jews," can no longer claim with any real force to be the "apple of Yahweh's eye" - is clearly displayed in the death of Stephen, the First Christian Martyr. Stephen was the first great Christian ecclesiastic and was "the Archdeacon" since he was pre-eminent of the seven deacons and great preacher of the Gospel. He is the harbinger of the Apostle Paul and anticipator of the new phase of Christianity of which Paul became the main vehicle. Moreover, because "the Jews" persecuted him and killed him for his teachings and faith in Christ he is the first martyr, that is, to him the name of "martyr" is first applied (Acts 23:20).

The Jews stoned Stephen when he publicly preached how Israel had consistently blasphemed Yahweh and rejected His promise to Abraham (Acts 7:17-60). Stephen was pointing the Nation of Israel back to the Song of Moses wherein the prophet said Yahweh would hide His face from Israel until the End Time. Moreover that the Gentiles would be brought into the Kingdom and then, eventually, mercy would be shown to "Israel" in their Restoration (Romans 11:7-32).

The Song of Moses testifies that God's enemies are exclusively Israel after the flesh (Deut. 32; Num. 35:33; Zech. 3:9), and foretells how Gentiles will take their place as Spiritual Israel (Rom. 10:19). This was known also to the Apostle Paul who taught that Yahweh's promise to Abraham was not to Israel by the Law, which was a curse from Yahweh (Neh. 10:29; Dan. 9:11; Rom. 3:10-13), but to all the elect of Adam's race and by faith alone. In short: that the special status of "God's Chosen People" was irreversibly removed from the race of people called the Israelites and especially the Judahites: but today often mistakenly called Judaeans or "the Jews."

That this special status was removed absolutely is starkly seen in the treatment of Israel by God: that the Will of God destroyed the Nation of Israel because it had broken Covenant with Him by defying His Commandments but, especially, because it had rejected His Son and sought His death on the Cross at Calvary.

Origen (c.185-c.254 AD) with the possible exception of Augustine was the most distinguished and most influential of all the theologians of the Early Church. Origen created the dogmatic of the Church and laid the foundations of the scientific criticism of the Old and New Testaments and thereby provided the intellectual expression and philosophic basis for Christianity. Origen was truly an epoch-making personality who despite the relentless persecution to which he was exposed, did more than any other man to win the Pagan World to the Christian religion. Understanding like Hippolytus the spiritual alienation afflicting "the Jews" and the providential aspect to their continued chauvinist mindset that had made Jewry a vehicle of tragedy because it had become a consummate Vehicle of Evil, he wrote:

"On account of their unbelief and other insults which they heaped upon Jesus, the Jews will not only suffer more than others in the judgement which is believed to impend over the world, but have even already endured such sufferings. For what nation is in exile from their own metropolis, and from the place sacred to the worship of their fathers, save the Jews alone? And the calamities they have suffered because they were a most wicked nation, which although guilty of many other sins, yet has been punished severely for none as for those that were committed against our Jesus."

It is in knowledge of the Evil that gripped the soul of Jewry that Hilary of Poitiers (c.315-c.367 AD) could speak of the Jews as "a people who had always persisted in iniquity and out of its abundance of evil glorified in wickedness." Similarly Gregory of Nyssa (330- 395), one of the Cappadocian Fathers, whose most important of his theological writings is his Catechesis, or Oratio Catechetica, an argumentative defence in forty chapters of Catholic teaching as against Jews, heathens, and heretics, wrote this:

"Slayers of the Lord, murderers of the prophets, adversaries of God, men who show contempt for the Law, foes of grace, enemies of their fathers' faith, advocates of the Devil, brood of vipers, slanderers, scoffers, men whose minds are in darkness, leaven of the Pharisees, assembly of demons, sinners, wicked men, stoners, and haters of righteousness."

This is in effect a reiteration of Christ's Discourse with the Pharisees, in which He informed not only them, but also the world of the inequity of the Pharisee mindset, which today manifests as, among other things, Judaism and Political Zionist.

Augustine of Hippo: (354-430 AD) one of the four great fathers of the Latin Church and one of its greatest theologians informed us of his opinion of the Jews. He said they were:

"... Blind to Holy Scripture, lacking in understanding, and haters of truth ¡¦ The true image of the Hebrew is Judas Iscariot, who sells the Lord for silver. The Jew can never understand the Scriptures and forever will bear the guilt for the death of Jesus."

In a sermon on Catechumens, Augustine said that:

"The Jews hold him, the Jews insult him, the Jews bind him, crown him with thorns, dishonour him with spitting, scourge him, overwhelm with reviling, hang him upon the tree, pierce him with a spear. The Jews killed him."

This, of course, tells us nothing that is not contained in the Four Gospels.

Pope Sylvester I (314-335 AD), under whose pontificate the ecumenical Council of Nicaea in 325 AD codified Christianity making it dogmatic and rigid, still understood the enmity of Jews to Christ and condemned "Jewish anti-Christian activity." Pope Gregory IX (c.1145-1241) who asserted the highest view of papal authority condemned the Talmud as containing "every kind of vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine." This is merely a reiteration of the charge made by Christ against the Pharisees, the champions of this wicked human invention.

Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) was the great theologian who reconciled Christian faith and Aristotelian reason in a comprehensive theology that provided the religious, moral and intellectual stability in Europe necessary to usher in the modern world. In his treatise On the Governance of the Jews he declared that:

"The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious."

Understanding, of course, the Evil at the root of usury and the inclination of certain men to use usury as a means of empowerment over others. The ancient Mosaic Laws included prohibition of exacting interest upon loans, for, Moses, the great prophet of Yahweh, commanded that the Israelites were to lend to their brethren without interest (Exod. 22:25; Lev. 25:36-37; Deut. 23:19, 20). This, however, did not apply to a stranger (Deut. 23:20) which of course applied to those not of the tribe. The violation of this law was viewed as a great crime (Psalms. 15:5; Prov. 28:8; Jer. 15:10), but abuses arose during the Judahite exile in Babylon. This slip into a profitable yet morally repugnant practice by the Judahites was viewed by some of them in the spirit of Moses. And, in this spirit Nehemiah, the newly instituted Governor of Judaea (5th century BC), with the aid of Ezra enforced the Mosaic Law. Moreover, one of his most striking moves was to force the people after the return to Jerusalem to give back any extortions at the rate of "one hundredth," or 1 percent monthly, which they had took from their brethren (Neh. 5:10).

However, Nehemiah's reforms could not stem the spiritual tide that had begun to carry the Judaeans into the troubled waters it found itself when some of them began to elevated usury to an art form. After The Return, and later, the Mosaic Law and Nehemiah's reform were much neglected (Neh. 5:7, 10). In the past, a good citizen of Israel was one who did not put out his money to usury (Psalms 15:5) and it is written that those who are guilty of this comes to disaster (Prov. 28:8). This is what Aquinas knew and understood. He also understood the problem inherent in the situation when an alien power arises within the nation, separate, aloof and cynical that works to empower itself at the expense of the indigenous peoples' hard work and goodwill.

Two years after the birth of Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812), patriarch of the infamous banking dynasty, Pope Benedict XIV (1675-1758) issued a Bull, Vix Pervenit, on November 1, 1745 "On Usury and Other Dishonest Profit." The polarity fundamental to the question of usury is given by this juxtaposition between the spirituality implicit in Vix Pervenit and the spirituality inherent in the person of Mayer Amschel Rothschild. When young Mayer grew to manhood he said this: "Give me control over a nation's currency, and I care not who makes the laws." His progeny eventually spread out across Europe to help set up the empire of Evil that was instrumental in the destruction of the royal houses of Europe that had existed for over a thousand years. And the voice of Evil that spoke through Mayer Amschel spoke also through his sons and heirs who revealed that:

"The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours that there will be no opposition from that class. The great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantages will bear its burden without complaint."

Compare the above quote with this from Vix Pervenit:

"There are many different contracts [loans] of this kind. In these contracts, if equality is not maintained, whatever is received over and above what is fair is a real injustice. Even though it may not fall under the precise rubric of usury (since all reciprocity, both open and hidden, is absent), restitution is obligated. Thus if everything is done correctly and weighed in the scales of justice, these same legitimate contracts suffice to provide a standard and a principle for engaging in commerce and fruitful business for the common good. Christian minds should not think that gainful commerce can flourish by usuries or other similar injustices. On the contrary, we learn from divine Revelation that justice raises up nations; sin, however, makes nations miserable."

From this comparison it should be concluded that the two authors speak with two very different voices. Whereas Pope Benedict XIV spoke from the spirituality arising from Christ, the Rothschild clan spoke with the authentic voice of Evil, but especially that of Satan who is called Ahriman.

The first voice concerns itself with redemption of souls and the second concerns itself with maximising wealth, power and prestige at the expense of others. Two voices, two spiritualities, one otherworldly and the second worldly, which is the great dichotomy within the souls of all men that resolves into such oppositions as Christ and the Pharisees; the New Testament and the Talmud; and, in the sphere of finance, the Knights Templars and "the Jews."

Thus, on this matter of the Jewish soul's immersion in Talmudic spirituality and its great utility in the Evil Agenda unfolding on Earth it should be concluded that, although vast in scale and with numerous individuals involved, the intentions and ill-will of Organised Jewry is personified in the being and works of the family called "Rothschild."

Their biographer Frederic Morton has given a fair account of the saga of the Rothschilds in his book The Rothschilds: Portrait of a Dynasty published in 1962. Here we learn that:

"On Saturday evenings, when prayer was done at the synagogue, Mayer would inveigle the rabbi into his house. They would bend towards one another on the green upholstery, sipping slowly at a glass of wine and argue about first and last things deep into the night. Even on work days ... Mayer ... was apt to tare down the big book of the Talmud and recite from it ... while the entire family must sit stock still and listen."

Morton writes that it is difficult for the average person to "comprehend Rothschild nor even the reason why he having so much, wanted to conquer more." Not understanding the true spiritual nature of the phenomenon. Rothschild and is spawn were, and still are, part of the Great Conspiracy against God on Earth and served different masters than the God in the Bible. Their spiritual succour came not from Christ but from the Dark Gods. The Talmud, which Mayer Amschel imbibed with obvious relish, was the Scripture of this Evil that provided sustenance to those people called Jews who despised Christ, the Gentile and his nation and worked to destroy all three. Morton understood instinctively that that motivation behind the Rothschild ascendancy in world banking was born from unholy desires unconnected with everyday concerns. Thus, Morton writes that Mayer Amschel Rothschild and his five sons were not only "wizards" of finance, and "fiendish calculators" but were motivated by a "demonic drive" to succeed in all their financial undertakings.

Nevertheless, the prescient observer understands the primary motive behind the Rothschild Enterprise: It was not money and power, or even absolute power per se, they sought, but the absolute destruction of Christendom and its replacement by the Dark Spirituality they worshipped and from whence they gained their own power.

The Rothschilds were, and still are, the visible representatives of the Cult of Evil that has worked ceaselessly and in the shadows to destroy Natural Moral Order on Earth and bring mankind to its knees. This Cabal of Evil has worked ceaselessly since time immemorial to bring about conditions auspicious for the incarnation in human form of the Dark Gods they worship. Such momentous events do not occur in a lifetime but unfold over many generations and that is why it is the Evil Agenda on Earth is part of the Great Conspiracy against God ... transcending time and space. Thus, the Evil Agenda is essentially the blueprint for the subversion of Natural Moral Order on Earth and the establishment of the New World Order that is the Kingdom of Antichrist on Earth.

Furthermore, the Rothschilds -seemingly all-powerful and unbelievably rich- are merely a modern manifestation of this ancient subversion. They are simply beads on a very long thread going far back in history. The Evil Agenda is a process of subversion and corruption that is inter-generational, subtle and unbelievable in scale that extends far back in history. For, in truth, the Rothschilds are cult members of the very ancient Cult of Evil, which is the oldest religion on Earth and the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer are at its head.