'¿Ö ¼º°æ¸¸À¸·Î ¾È µÉ±î?'
'±×·¯¸é ¿ì¸®´Â ¾î¶»°Ô »ì °ÍÀΰ¡?'¸¦ °í¹ÎÇÒ ¶§~
'»îÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì¿Í ÅëÀϼº'À» ¾Ë¾Æ¾ß ÇÒ ¶§ÀÔ´Ï´Ù~click

"As I live, saith the Lord God, surely because my flock became a prey, and my flock became meat to every beast of the field, because there was no shepherd, neither did my shepherds search for my flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock" Ezek. 34:8

" 'Anti-Semitism' ¡¦ opposition to Zionism: sympathy with opponents of the state of Israel." Merriam Webster's Third New International Dictionary (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2003), one of America's premier lexicographical works. When the Webster's official publicist, Mr Arthur Bicknell, was asked to account for this grotesque definition his pitiful response was that it is:

"Our job is to accurately reflect English as it is actually being used. We don't make judgement calls; we're not political." Unfortunately, Bicknell gives the game away when he vouchsafes that the dictionary's editors tabulate "citational evidence" about anti-Semitism published in "carefully written prose-like books and magazines".

---

To understand how history is perceived by the masses one must understand a depressing fact: Objective Reality is invariably dismissed by people as fiction and illusion. Moreover, that the majority willingly believe the comfortable illusion carefully contrived by the powerful forces that control their "reality." They, The-Powers-That-Be, control this "reality" because they control the mass media and other information sources by which the masses compile their image of reality.

Furthermore, when Objective Reality, Objective History, is presented to people it invariably clashes with the these personal worldviews, these comfortable "realities," all derived from these dubious sources. Moreover, this position of mental and emotional entrenchment means that people reject Objective Reality and cling to their cherished illusion because it is not only easier to do so but infinitely more comfortable.

But what is even more cruel is the fact that the person who thinks he has come to these conclusions or holds these beliefs out of some genuine moral or intellectual effort finds that this is not the case. That his cherished personal worldview is in fact the very same held by the majority. Why is this so? Because it is the opinions, beliefs and thoughts of the modern Masters of Illusion who pour them into the subconscious of anyone who sits passively in front of TVs. The billions of people who allow the talking-heads on TV, the "experts," to tell them how to think on any and every subject. For, in truth, the "opinions" of these billions are merely the "opinions" of the "experts" they see and hear in the mass media and which they parrot the following day thinking they are their own. Such is the sophistication of modern propaganda and the scientific techniques of mass mind control and manipulation.

The Masters of Illusion who control the reality of billions now boast of their power. An example is the unnamed presidential advisor who in an interview describing his part in the White House and Pentagon's selling of the idea of war with Afghanistan and Iraq to the American public following the so-called "9/11" outrage. In it the White House aide was candid, so candid he was obviously following the Karmic imperative felt by some members of the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies called the "revelation of the method." In a chilling few words the unknown White House aide, an agentur of the Illuminati, articulated the sad fact of modern life. That the vast majority of humanity are simply unwitting pawns in the Great Game, the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government.

"That is not the way the world really works any more. We are an empire now and when we act we create our own reality and while you study that reality, judiciously as you will, we will act again creating other new realities which you can study too. And that is how things will sort out. We are history's actors and you, all of you, will be left just to study what we do." quoted by Christian Salmon, La Monde Diplomatique Jan 1 2008

The emotional and intellectual attachment of people to their cherished, personal illusions is immensely strong. An analogy of this strength is the response of a patient who is told by his doctor that he has terminal cancer. The reality is that the patient has cancer and is going to die earlier than he supposed. The illusion is that he has not and he is going to live to an old age. The patient clings to this illusion with a passion and commitment that seems unshakeable. Yet, any doctor dealing with such patients will tell of the four-phase transformation of the patient as maudlin illusion dissolves into the stark Reality.

First, the patient refuses to accept the news of his disease, that is, the Reality, and is in denial. Second, there is anger that he has been the victim of fate in his misplaced trust in the illusion that he will live to an old age. Third, a great depression descends as he realises the consequences of this trust in the illusion of near-immortality and how cruelly he has been mislead. Fourth, his commitment to the fact of his circumstances, which is acceptance of the Reality of his condition and not the fantasy of the illusion. Denial, anger, depression and commitment: the four-phase transformation from belief in the Illusion to understanding the Reality.

Patrick Henry (1736-99), the American Revolutionary leader and famous orator who spoke out against British rule of the American colonies understood the predisposition of men to wishfully think and deny the Reality of the situation:

"It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth.... Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?"

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-59) the French historian and politician, whose book Democracy in America (De la Démocratie en Amerique) give him a European reputation, and in which he came to some general conclusion. For example, that greater equality requires greater centralisation and therefore diminishes liberty; and the importance of religion in a sustaining a democracy. He also observed elsewhere that it is easier for the world to accept a simple lie than a complex truth. This, then, is a simple truth: most people suspend critical thinking, if indeed they posses it at all, at the earliest convenience when confronted by a complex truth because understanding it demands effort.

"What good fortune" said Hitler, the master deceiver, "for those in power that people do not think." Tyrants understand instinctively the more docile and stupefied the people the easier it is to consolidate their power and then to use it arbitrarily to destroy the will of the people. That is why the great task of the tyrant is to control the reality of the people, and in the modern era this ultimately means propaganda, the control of information, and mass mind control and manipulation. Hitler understood this and was a consummate propagandist:

"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will understand it ... Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise."

De Tocqueville's observation that people will accept a simple lie rather than expend the mental energy to comprehend a complex truth is the phenomenon all propagandists manipulate. The other phenomenon exploited is the popular fantasy of the belief in the inherent good nature of leaders and of their best intentions towards the masses.

"The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies."

Or pithier:

"The great masses of the people ... will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one."

Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) the English philosopher and mathematician understood the power of propaganda, who monopolises it and of the powerful modern methods of mass communication used to disseminate it. Creating a "Mass Psychology" i.e. the illusion.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology... Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions are generated."

Morris Janowitz, Professor of Psychology at Chicago University understood this and understood the most powerful tool in the manipulation of the masses is the television which "has allowed us to create a common culture, and without it we would not have been able to accomplish our goal." (American Story, Public Television, December 1, 1984) it is not insignificant that common appellations for the television are "boob tube," "idiot box" and "goggle box" amongst others. A doyen of US broadcasting is Walter Cronkite who tells us that for him and people like him it is "Our task is not to tell the truth; we are opinion molders."

Edward L. Bernays (1891-1995) was born in Vienna, Austria the nephew of the creator of "psychoanalysis" Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) and was therefore Jewish. Where uncle Sigmund created fictions about human consciousness and become rich and famous from it, nephew Edward become rich and famous by creating fictions per se. Bernays was one of the first to understanding the link between mass-produced goods and unconscious desires and that people could be made to want things they did not need, or which were of no real use or benefit to them. Consequently the people who benefit from his deceits as the "father of public relations" regard Bernays with affection and the fact he coined the term "public relations" when he set up a "public relations" office in New York.

Sigmund Freud was not only a fraud, but also the entire structure of modern psychoanalysis and the profitable industry built on it is little more than a house of cards. It is a cruel fallacy that has made men rich, that has gifted to the "analysts" personal power over others and has caused untold misery and confusion to the "patients," who are the victims of both themselves and their "analyst." Psychoanalysis is a terribly flawed system that does nothing but sow seeds of confusion and so can never heal or cure. Yet, it has been elevated from an obscurity it deserves to an exalted status in some parts of the world, that in a more moral and sensible world, it could never arrogate for itself. Yet, it is lauded as a powerful technique for identifying and curing mental diseases and enjoys a celebrity and reputation that belies its inner wickedness.

The entire system is an attempted to reduce humans into little more than farmyard animals with a certain sense of shame by denying the nobility of the human spirit. The contempt Freud had for humanity is shown not only in his fraudulent confection he called "psychoanalysis" but also in his treatment of his patients, who, primarily, consisted of middle class Viennese women suffering from "hysteria," and his handling of the "scientific data" from these sessions. Freud's arrogance and contempt for his patients and colleagues was legendary and his secret contempt for mankind can be discerned in this: "I can't help being convinced that my dear fellow men, with few exceptions, are worthless."

But, when one finds that International Usury, which is a cynical economic exploitation of people, was primarily Jewish contrived and organised. And that Marxism, which is a cynical political exploitation of the masses, was Jewish inspired. And that Psychoanalysis, which is the cynical exploitation of misery, was also Jewish inspired then one may be justified in thinking some deeper mechanism is at work. Moreover, when one learns that the modern "public relations industry," which is the cynical manipulation of the subconscious for economic and political advantage, was similarly Jewish inspired, then an astute honest investigator should be alerted to a common theme.

Bernays was one of the first people to realise and get rich from the idea that people can be easily fooled on a huge scale by persistent lies cunningly employed. This was done by creating fictions (some of which contained elements of truth) into marketable commodities. Bernays, whether the "consumer" realised it or not, had "commodified" information and employed it in a cynical system of exchange whereby the "consumer" is always at a huge disadvantage to the "producer."

Bernays had worked in the US War Department's Committee on Public Information, the propaganda arm of the US war effort in the Great War (1914-18), and had developed these nefarious propaganda techniques for use in peacetime "public relations." One of Bernays' first assignments was to help sell the First World War, the "War to end all wars," to the American public with the idea, but in reality a whopping lie, to "Make the World Safe for Democracy."

From this ominous start Bernays went on to dominated the "public relations" industry until the 1940s, but was also a significant force for another 40 years after that. And it was his stamp that is felt in the sophisticated mind-controlling techniques that herd consumers into decisions they, on reflection and with detachment, would not, in the majority, otherwise take.

Borrowing ideas from his uncle Sigmund, Bernays not only perfected propaganda techniques that subconsciously compelled people to buy products they did not need, but also shaped the way they perceived issues and the very way they conceived reality. In his autobiography called Propaganda, Bernays relates how he took the ideas of Uncle Sigmund and applied them to the emerging science of mass persuasion, or what Russell called "Mass Psychology."

Bernays regarded Uncle Sigmund as a mentor and, as would be expected of a "P.R. guru," traded on his famous uncle's name and reputation as "the father of psychoanalysis" to inflate his own stature. He also used Freud' insights into the human psyche and motivation to design his "public relations" campaigns. However, whereas Uncle Sigmund's "talking cure" was designed to bring to the surface a patient's unconscious drives and hidden motives in the belief that when consciously debated that this would help people lead healthier lives. Nephew Edward, by contrast, used similar psychological techniques to camouflage the motives and intentions of his clients, as part of a deliberate strategy designed to keep the public unconscious of the forces, and people, which were working to mould their minds.

Where Freud's ideas are terribly flawed and do nothing to help the patient, Bernays' system is flawless in its aim, which is to use the same ideas for marketing purposes, by masking agendas and creating illusions that deceive and misrepresent.

Many of subterfuges of the "public relations" industry are laughable if they were not so pernicious in their intent and striking illustrations of the potent power of the mass psychology techniques it uses. In this the gurus of the "PR" industry understand clearly how foolish most people are on the very things that are unproductive, unhealthy and dangerous for them. What most people signally fail to understand is how thoroughly "public relations" had transmogrified the relationship between Objective Reality and the cynically created illusion, the commercial facsimile, offered to them by the "P.R. men." For, the audacity of the "public relations" industry was such that soon after Freud's and Bernays' unwholesome discoveries, and after the "P.R. men" were done, it was often impossible to tell the real from the counterfeit, fact from fiction, information from misinformation, an actual event from a fictive one. In short, Bernays and his ilk were master hucksters who had combined the dexterity of a conjurer and the morality of the chiseller with the discoveries of Freud and others and so created the "public relations" industry. An industry whose whole business is the cynical manipulation of the public's perception.

Bernays and his ilk were the wizards who erected a hall of mirrors that changed the nature of reality itself. And such power in certain hands inevitably leads to the monolithic abuse of this power. Bernays concealed his chicanery behind a euphemism, referring to himself as a "public relations counsellor." Yet, as with all things concealed within euphemism, the reality is far different. Bernays' detractors dismiss him as a glorified press agent at best or a young Machiavelli at worst, but the reality is that he, as well as some of his peers, had an enormous influence upon history.

By creating the Public Relations Industry, Bernays not only gifted generations of deceivers the perverse morality and sharp techniques that swayed public opinion, whether this was selling a product or personality, he also showed how to commercialise culture.

What Bernays did for tobacco barons, car kings, and fruit pedlars, he also did for politicians such as Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover. For, like insurance, anything and anyone can be packaged or repackaged, sold and resold. However strange at may seem, Bernays who is credited as being the "father of public relations" and the "father of spin" and a master of evasion and euphemism is remarkably frank about his skills. He was a propagandist and proud of it. Moreover, he expends one chapter in his book Propaganda explaining that the word "propaganda" has been misunderstood by the ignorant public. That it was originally an honourable word meaning the "propagation of truth" but has now fallen into disrepute and applied to other things less wholesome. In this wise, Bernays informs us that:

"Formerly the rulers were the leaders. They laid out the course of history by the simple process of doing what they wanted. And if nowadays the successors of the rulers, those whose position or ability gives them power, can no longer do what they want without the approval of the masses, they find in propaganda a tool which is increasingly powerful in gaining that approval. Therefore, propaganda is here to stay ¡¦ It was, of course, the astounding success of propaganda during the war that opened the eyes of the intelligent few in all departments of life to the possibilities of regimenting the public mind. The American government and numerous patriotic agencies developed a technique which, to most persons accustomed to bidding for public acceptance, was new. They not only appealed to the individual by means of every approach - visual, graphic, and auditory - to support the national endeavour, but they also secured the cooperation of the key men in every group - persons whose mere word carried authority to hundreds of thousands of followers. They thus automatically gained the support of fraternal, religious, commercial, patriotic, social and local groups whose members took their opinions from their accustomed leaders and spokesmen, or from the periodical publications which they were accustomed to read and believe. At the same time, the manipulators of patriotic opinion made use of the mental clichés and the emotional habits of the public to produce mass reactions against the alleged atrocities, the terror and tyranny of the enemy. It was only natural, after the war ended, that intelligent persons should ask themselves whether it was not possible to apply a similar technique to the problems of peace ¡¦ As a matter of fact, the practice of propaganda since the war has assumed very different forms from those prevalent twenty years ago ¡¦ It takes account not merely of the individual, nor even of the mass mind alone, but also and especially of the anatomy of society, with its interlocking group formations and loyalties. It sees the individual not only as a cell in the social organism but as a cell organized into the social unit. Touch a nerve at a sensitive spot and you get an automatic response from certain specific members of the organism."

According to Bernays, his "public relations" way of mass persuasion is a prerequisite in a modern, organised democratic society and if scientific means were not used to convince people of the "desired truth" then there would be, in Bernays' opinion, social chaos. "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses" he wrote, "is an important element in democratic society."

One cannot help questioning whether an intelligent man like Bernays, who understood the mutability of public opinion, and made a fortune for him and others out of this knowledge, was really so naïve as he appeared to want people to believe on the matter of the abuse of power. That he did not, or could not, understand or want to believe that any system that is designed to infix opinions in the human mind or influence public sentiment (no matter how honest the professed intent) will not be seized upon by those seeking power over others or for the promotion of self-interest. In fact, Bernays knew exactly what the score was on this most important matter and he was honest enough, early in his career of chicanery, to reveal it to the keen student of history.

Bernays' book Propaganda was first published in 1928. Its avowed aim was to introduce and frankly explain the nature of the new system its author had greatly helped to create to those who would most benefit from it: the new, educated class of people who would be making a living out of the manipulation of the "group mind," of public opinion.

It was a sort of technical essay for the use of this new class of manipulators and within its pages is a glimpse of the true nature of how "democracies" and tyrannies are really run. Although he himself was not attempting to expose the Shadow Government, the hidden government that runs much of the temporal affairs of this world, neither was he attempting to expose a conspiracy; but, careful reading of his book reveals the reality of the situation. Bernays helpfully tells his readers that:

"If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it."

He is even more helpful when he tells us that:

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our government. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is the logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized."

The students who read Bernays (and other insiders spilling some of the beans) are taught that there is no conspiracy and no cause to think that there is one. For, it is obvious that most people who have careers in public manipulation and mass psychology will not care to think that their work of creating illusions is in the service of the Great Conspiracy for World Government. Yet, when we read in Bernays' Propaganda such things as these, then one must conclude that Bernays is far more honest than his creation and his disciples:

"Those who manipulate the organized habits and opinions of the masses constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.... In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons . . . who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind ... as civilization has become more complex ... the technical means have been invented and developed by which opinion may be regimented.... I must lead the people. Am I not their servant ¡¦ The invisible government tends to be concentrated in the hands of the few because of the expense of manipulating the social machinery which controls the opinions and habits of the masses ¡¦ .It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes."

On the reality and nature of this "invisible government" Bernays is more than helpful:

"Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner cabinet. They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social structure. Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons - a trifling fraction ¡¦ who understand the mental processes and mental patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world. It is not usually realized how necessary these invisible governors are to the orderly functioning of our life group. In theory, every citizen may vote for whom he pleases. Our constitution does not envisage political parties as part of the mechanism of government, and its framers seem not to have pictured to themselves the existence in our national politics of anything like the modern political machine. But American voters soon found that without organization and direction their individual votes, cast, perhaps, for dozens or hundreds of candidates, would produce nothing but confusion. Invisible government, in the shape of rudimentary political parties, arose almost overnight. Ever since then we have agreed, for the sake of simplicity and practicality, that party machines should narrow down the field of choice to two candidates, or at most three or four. In theory, every citizen makes up his mind on public questions and matters of private conduct. In practice, if all men had to study for themselves the abstruse economic, political, and ethical data involved in every question, they would find it impossible to come to a conclusion about anything. We have voluntarily agreed to let an invisible government sift the data and high-spot the outstanding issues so that our field of choice shall be narrowed to practical proportions."

Former NBC news president Rubin Frank, who should know about these things said: "News is what someone wants to suppress. Everything else is advertising." Senior vice president and Washington bureau chief for CNN, Frank Sesno confirms the arrogance of these self-appointed arbiters of the Truth "We tell the people what they need to know, not what they want to know." Richard Salent, the former President CBS News was also part of this agenda tells us unabashedly that: "Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have."

Alfred Harmsworth, later Lord Northcliffe, was the British newspaper tycoon who invented modern tabloid journalism. In 1896 he launched the Daily Mail, which was the first British mass daily aimed at the new mass literate readership appearing in Britain: the literate working class superciliously called "the music hall vote." Northcliffe's aim with the Daily Mail was to serve as "the Voice of Empire" since the idea of the British Empire not only appealed to all classes but also it had become a kind of opiate for the British people, an intoxicant they could not do without. In short, Northcliffe's jingoist journalism was lapped up by whole swathes of the British working class. Northcliffe obviously knew a thing or two about journalism and the "group mind." A knowledge summed up by this: "News is what someone, somewhere is trying to suppress, the rest is just advertising." And, this arch-manipulator of reality knew of what he spoke.

The Art of War is a collection of essays attributed to a Chinese general Sun Tzu (5th century BC), but more probably by unknown Chinese authors (c.500–320 BC) using an illustrious name as their nom de plume. It is a compendium of sophisticated treatises (on philosophy, logistics, espionage, strategy and tactics) which is the earliest known writings on the subject of the "art of war." And central to the arguments is the simple maxim but powerful truth: "All warfare is based on deception." It is thus no idle boast that the shibboleth of one of the most cruel and efficient secret services, Zionist Israel's Mossad is this: "By way of deception, thou shalt do war."

Abraham Lincoln (1809-65), the 16th President of the United States who saved his country from the Invisible Money Power during the Civil War and was assassinated by their agent, Booth, because of it, said this:

"Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail. Without it nothing can succeed. He who molds opinion is greater than he who enacts laws."

This, of course, the nurturing of "public sentiment," was the tact used by Roman emperors to placate their populace. By the promotion of the illusion of effluence, civic pride, military strength, continuity and stability by giving them, in the words of the Roman satirist, Juvenal (60-130), "bread and circuses." This, then, is the key: keep people affluent enough to become self-indulgent, mentally lazy and morally lax: the "bread", while providing comfortable illusions, by providing the people with distractions pandering to base common standards: the "circuses."

That is why, in Hitler's words, the "propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will understand it." That is why the standard of popular culture spewing out of Hollywood and TV stations are so appalling: it is for a reason unconnected with the economics of the entertainment industry. They are all appealing to base natures and crude intellects; the very same constituency called in Victorian Britain "the music hall vote."

It is part of the "circus" stratagem used by the Masters of Illusion to give distractions to the people so that they do not think too hard on weighty matters. For, these "circuses," these Hollywood and TV distractions, also help significantly to remove the faculty of critical thinking from the individual. That is, part of the process of deliberately dumbing-down the population thereby rendering them ever more uncritical, passive, compliant and lowbrowed. And therefore, in this dumbed-down condition, easier to manipulate and control.

This is the reason why the deliberate dumbing-down of the population is an essential weapon in the Armoury of Evil. That is why people in the media who mould modern reality like Northcliffe, Cronkite, Salent, Sesno and Frank can smugly tell us that they can do what they do and with impunity. And, the men who would be kings of this world want to create a Grand Illusion, using placemen like Salent, Sesno and Frank, that is at odds with what is actually happening on Earth. The Masters of Illusion want to make the vast majority of the world's people wholly ignorant of the world in which they live. Why? Because they know that by keeping the people ignorant of the real world is to have immense power over them.

The deliberate dumbing-down of the population and keeping them wholly ignorant of the world in which they live is an imperative of the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government, which is better known as the New World Order. That is why the evil architects of the New World Order, "history's actors," act to create their "own reality" and while the world ponders this "act again creating other new realities." In other words, the mass of humanity are de facto passive observers of world history and cannot do anything about it even if they do not like what they see.

Control of information and truth is critical in the Dark Art of mass deception. Benjamin Franklin (1706-90) who helped draw up the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and played a major role in the American Revolution and negotiated French support for the colonists, confirmed this truth: "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech." That is why Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936) wrote:

"The first casualty of war is truth."

Wars are never fought for the reasons given to the men sent out by their War Leaders to fight and die, suffer and bleed. Modern wars are fought for asymmetric goals wholly different from the stated aims of the War Leaders. Modern wars are fought to change society not to defeat a perceived enemy. The planned social engineering of Western Society into forms amenable to the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government is easier when people's attentions are elsewhere: on images of armed combat, of big explosions and body bags being unloaded from planes.

The public's morbid fascination, fear, guilt, shame, anger and grief are all mobilised by the evil architects of these engineered wars ... wars contrived by the War Leaders to divert attention away from the radical, society-transforming agenda unfolding on the home front. War Leaders contrive enemies seemingly out of thin air. Yet, the the contrived, engineered wars invariably take many years planning to bring to fruition. Gentle reader, understand these created wars and revolutions are never spontaneous but have been meticulously plotted and the scenarios fastidious poured over for many years by very wicked and very evil men. For, these devilishly conceive wars are the rocks upon which Christendom is being crashed.

The evil architects of the New World Order have used many contrived and created revolutions and wars to achieve their goal of World Government. Hence, The English Civil War, the French Revolution, the Boer War, the Bolshevik Revolution, Communism, the "Red Menace," the "Cold War," Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, the "War on Drugs" are all part of this cynical manipulation of reality orchestrated by the Shadow Government of this world who are the human agents of Evil.

McGeorge Bundy was an influential member of President Lyndon Johnson's administration who drafted the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution several days before the Gulf of Tonkin Incident occurred. He was also a "Skull and Bones" member, an agentur of the Illuminati and scion of the Bundy Illuminati family. On the matter of ending the war in Vietnam he said this: