처음으로
esesang91.com설립 개요
내적치유관련자료
개혁주의&청교도
상담 Counseling
|
|
Jewish Conspiracy 43
Jewish Conspiracy 43 자료출처 http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/jewish_conspiracy_43.html
"For the love of money is the root of all evil" (2 Tim. 6:10)
That "the Jews" are now the Elite Mammonites was only made possible by the destruction of the great impediment of the Knights Templars who were verily the first international bankers. If the Knights Templars endured there would be no need of the "court Jew" and his bulging purse and so the rise of "the Jews" would have been severely curtailed. This could not happen since the Confederacy of Evil had plans for the rancorous, scheming Jew. Thus, the Dark Gods moved to remove the great impediment and so contrived to destroyed the first international bankers, the Knights Templars. The spiritual warriors who were the guardians of the Christ Impulse and who had worked to create a modern civilisation in Europe based on the spirituality released from the Cross at Cavalry. And in this they largely succeeded and Western Christian Civilisation became established. The Dark Forces opposed the spiritual inspiration of Templars and the designs that it had for the evolution of European civilisation using the Templar Order as its tool. The Dark Gods worked diligently to extinguish the impulse that was moulding the social architecture of the emerging European nation states. They gained a victory when they inspired Philip le Bel to remove the Templars from the Great Game and cause their carefully crafted banking system to be destroyed. The Jew moneylender came into his own following the Templars' destruction, for, the Jews greedily made themselves the pre-eminent moneychangers of Europe in their stead. The Power of the Purse was well known to the secret masters of Jewry who practised it for centuries before the demise of the Templars. Warner Sombart in his book Les Juifs et la vie economique is helpful on this point:
"And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves" Mark 11:15 "And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise." John 2:15-16 The rise of the Jew as the pre-eminent moneylender is a salient example of the growing corruption ensnaring the world. A phenomenon numerous people have commented upon. Money changing and lending is an ancient practice that the Jew has made his own, his forte so to speak. The beginnings of this trade were in the post-Exodus period when the law was passed requiring every male Israelite from twenty years and upwards to pay into the treasury of the sanctuary a half a shekel every year as an offering to Jehovah (Exod. 30:13-15). The Jews coming to the feasts from all parts of the world were therefore obliged to exchange the various coins in common circulation for this Jewish piece. There arose a class of men, who frequented the temple courts, who offered to who exacted a premium for the exchange of foreign coins. These were the moneychangers who exacted a premium for the exchange and whose trade became a very lucrative one, since the exchangers exacted whatever fee they might. The profession of moneychanger in Palestine was thus brought about because of the levying of a religious tax on the people by the priesthood. Christ showed anger only once in the Gospels and that was when He came into Jerusalem and went into the temple and found the moneychangers their, conducting their sinful trade in the House of the Lord (Matt. 21:12; Mark 11:15; John 2:15). Christ's righteous anger was not only because of the greed and impiety of these men. Nor was it that they conducted their trade dishonestly or that they obtruded a secular business within the house of prayer. The main reason for the great anger was that Christ understood completely, as only God could, the future role usury would play in the unfolding drama of the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government. For, Christ new of the future corruption of "the Jews," of the Jewish people, because of their love of Mammon and the crucial part Usury would play in the enslavement of the world and, moreover, with Jewry as its greatest exponent. The Profaners of the Temple were the forbears of the Profaners of the Christ Impulse and Usury and Revolution would be their two greatest weapons. Christ's anger against the moneychangers was great indeed. By pouring out the money onto the ground, He showed His utter contempt of it and by overthrowing the tables of the moneychangers He showed is great displeasure of those that make worldly profit out of religion. He then drove them all out of the Temple and so by throwing out the money, overturning the tables, He threw out the wicked trade too. Significantly, He did not complain to the chief priests about the corruptions in the Temple, which it was their sacred duty to safeguard; for, He knew they countenanced those corruptions. That the traffickers and Moneychangers were allowed free reign in the temple was scandal enough but the condoning of it by the priesthood was betrayal of the cruellest kind. The presence of these wordily profiteers was symbolic of the degradation of the priesthood and evidence of the hold the Cult of Evil had by then on the high priests of The Temple and the Sanhedrin. It was thus a combination of these three things that aroused Christ to such anger. The fact of desecration of the Temple by usurers: The fact that the priesthood was controlled by the Cult of Evil: And, the understanding of the future role of usury, but especially Jewish Usury in the Evil Agenda to enslave mankind.
Not all Jews are international financiers and not all international financiers are Jews. However, the uniqueness of Jewry, its religious and racial integrity spread out over continents and generations and the endemic sense of racial superiority, has nurtured the skills, wherewithal and inclination to prevail over the goyim. Thus, the Modern Tribe of Jews has thrown up usurers of astonishing skill and invention. The stratagems of the Two Dark Gods are ingenious, subtle and unfold over many generations. The skills and reputation of "the Jews" regarding finance have been gained from many centuries of effort. The Dark Gods required a means whereby humanity was continually in bondage and easily controlled by a cadre of evil whenever they required it. That is why the phenomenon of usury was nurtured such that the finances of the private individual and the purse of the king could be plundered at will. Moreover, the conspirators targeted the finances of kings, states and nations: for, they knew that they who controlled the credit of a nation controlled that nation. Thus, the Jew moneylender developed the skills necessary that would make himself, or rather his bulging purse, useful to profligate princes and kings. Thus the phenomenon of the "court Jew" who had wheedled themselves into the noble houses and royal courts of Europe. However, it was not philanthropy or "self-preservation" that drove these men but another more long-term agenda: the eventual bondage of the nobleman and king and hence the holding in Jewish hands the mortgage of Gentile feudal lands. This, then, was the great prize. But, the rise of the Power of the Jewish Purse brought with it, for "the Jews" anyway, an unintended consequence. That, as "the Jews" grew fat of the Gentile and the Gentile became both increasingly impoverished and alarmed at the exclusiveness of Jewry, Gentile resentment morphed into violent reaction. The sudden realisation that the enrichment and empowerment of "the Jews" was to the detriment of the gentile and his nation. The time when the indigenous people insisted that "the Jews" should be removed from their lands. Thus, the historical phenomenon of the mass expulsion of "the Jews" from Gentile lands. Moreover, the metamorphosis of the wandering, alien Jew settling in Gentile lands, an unwelcome guest who becomes a convenient resource then trusted adviser then betrayer of the nation. This is the reason why "the Jews" were expelled from all states that they settled. The common historical theme of mass expulsion was not a product of xenophobia or racism. What can be seen in this recurring theme is the sudden realisation of the host people that their best interests were threatened by the continued presence of the Jew in their country. The best interests of the people were founded on freedom from bondage to usurers, especially the nobles and kings. "The Jews" have dominated the banking industry for more than one thousand years because of the Church'sl interpretations regarding the lending of money at interest and the destruction of the Knights Templars by the Confederacy of Evil. This was as intended by the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer who have cultivated and corrupted the unique status of the Jew, to use the Jew as an integral instrument in the furtherance of their agenda of enslavement of humanity. The immorality of usury was well known to the Hebrews but the strict moral sanction was slowly attenuated by successive generations of Judaeans who were inexorably submerged in the Ahrimanic spirituality that drew them ever further away from Yahweh and ultimately set them in opposition to Christ, by which time they were called " the Jews." The Jewish theologian Moses Maimonides (1135-1204), who codified Jewish law in the Talmud, said this on the matter: "why is [usury] called nesek [biting]? Because he who takes it bites his fellow, causes pain to him, and eats his flesh." Usury was repeatedly proscribed in the Old Testament. It was also given similar treatment in the Koran, the sacred writings of Islam revealed by Allah to the prophet Mohammed, which also expressly prohibit lending money at "interest." However, the Evil Agenda required Jewry as its mechanism by which to impoverish kings and nations and thus the Talmudic mindset that gripped the Jewish soul soon managed to erect sophistical arguments to nullify the Word of God.
"Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it" (Deut. 23:20). This obviously begs the question who is a brother and who is a stranger? In the wicked Talmud teachings, "brother" means "Jew," while "stranger" is anyone else. Ambrose (339-397), the bishop of Milan and one of the most illustrious Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church, whose works greatly influenced the scholastics, "considered lending to a stranger a legitimate hostile act against an enemy." Thomas Aquinas (1225-74), the greatest of the scholastics, Philosopher, theologian, doctor of the Church (Angelicus Doctor), patron of Catholic universities, colleges, and schools said this about the problem of usury and the Deutoronomic double standard practised by Jews: "The Jews were forbidden to take usury from their brethren, that is, from other Jews. By this we are given to understand that to take usury from another man is simply evil, because we ought to treat every man as our neighbour and brother..." Even "the Jews" that converted to Christianity were violent critics of the Usurious Jews. For instance, the convert, Johannes Pffeferkorn, argued that profits from usury was the main reason that Jews remained Jews, since they were reluctant to become Christians and do "honest work." Another, Anton Margaritha, argued that such "honest work by Jews would humble them." Conversely, as Abram Leon states, the Jewish "monopoly of usury brought them such wealth that some Christians undoubtedly went over to Judaism in order to participate in the Jewish monopoly in lending." The key to understanding the duplicity of the Jewish mind and the ease at which it can rationalise an enduring irrational hate of non-Jews is the religion of the modern Jew, the majority of them, and his "holy book": that is, Pharisaism (Judaism) and the Talmud. The Pharisaic Religion concretised in the Talmud is inimical to Christianity and therefore to God and violates the moral laws arising from Them. The Talmud is a practical manual for the despoliation of the world and its non-Jewish communities framed in religious language but whose wellspring is not the God of the Bible. For, the Talmud is the product of a long process of the corruption of the Yahweh religion that had begun in the seventh century before the Incarnation of Christ. Furthermore, this anti-Yahweh and anti-Christ religion was the art and practice of the Pharisee, Sadducee and Scribe. The spirituality that energised the minds of the authors of the Talmud was not only inimical to the Christ Impulse but its opposite and mortal enemy on Earth. Therefore, understanding the Pharisee mindset is by contrast an aid toward understanding the spirit of uncorrupted Christianity, which is the Apostolic Christianity that contained the purity of Christ's message. While Christ's message attempted to call men to the Law of God itself as the supreme guide of life, the Pharisees corrupted the Yahweh religion making it a vehicle for Evil. That is, they corrupted Yahwehism into Pharisaism, which is today is called Judaism. Heinrich Graetz (1817–91) who was a Jewish bigot who believed that Judaism (Pharisaism) was, after "the Jews" at least, the superlative manifestation in Creation tells us that:
The "isolated instances of uncharitable judgements and decrees against the members of other nations and religions," described by Professor Graetz are a recurring theme running throughout Talmudic thought. It is also indicative of hatred and arrogance that is the root cause of the modern "Jewish Problem" as it is also the spirituality behind the sophistical arguments justifying usury. Werner Sombart (1863-1941) the German economist studied the phenomenon of modern capitalism and the relation between "the Jews" and modern capitalism. Sombart published his findings in The Jews and Modern Capitalism. Sombart tells us of the profane nature of Talmudism: "The principal characteristic of the Jewish religion consists in its being alien to the Hereafter, a religion, as it were, solely and essentially worldly." That is, Jewish theology has been deliberately moulded to suit the worldly ambitions of Jewry, but especially its hidden masters the Black Adepts of the Kabbalah -the High Priests of the Luciferian Creed- who serve the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer. The pristine nature of the Torah, that was the inspiration for the Talmud, has been corrupted by successive generations of rabbis who have collectively worked to remove the imperatives of Yahweh from it and fashion an alternative theology based on precepts inimical to both Yahweh and Christ, but especially towards Christ. Mohammed (570-632), the Arab prophet who founded Islam also perceived this corruption: "Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them, God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit." The move to create a worldly Jewish religion, Pharisaism and its "holy book," the Talmud, with very definite utilitarian precepts occurred long ago. When men took it upon themselves to put words in the mouth of God and to present themselves as supremely gifted interpreters of what was "really" in God's Mind. It was a long-term strategy of the Dark Gods to turn the Tribe of Judah, (the Judahites) once the vehicle of the greatest good by providing the perfect human vessel for the Incarnation of Christ, into the vehicle of the greatest Evil. Or rather, by nurturing a people who would filching the good name, reputation of Judah and his Yahweh Promises. Thereby, bringing about the situation whereby the Evil Agenda is transmitted through the historical process and across continents with consummate ease by a tribe of people calling themselves "the Jews." The Modern Tribe of Jews that has made itself a consummate vehicle of Evil because of the secret and enduring rancour of the Jew for the Gentile, his nation and his God. The Talmudic commentary on the Hebrew Bible is the supreme law of contemporary Jewry and not the Torah or the rest of the Hebrew Bible. That is why the Talmud College, the yeshiva and their scholars hold such a prominent place in the Jewish community. Thus, the Jewish Chronicle (March 26, 1993) published in Britain states that in the yeshiva, Jews are "devoted to the Talmud to the exclusion of everything else." The Pharisaic doctrine that the commandments of rabbis and not the Word of God should prevail in Jewish society is at the root of the Talmudic creed. But it is a creed and commentary that Jesus Christ denounced as voiding the Laws of God and not upholding them. The Talmud had not yet been written down in Christ's time but he condemned the traditions of the Mishnah (the early manifestation of the Talmud) and those who taught it (the Scribes and Pharisees), because it effectively quashed Biblical teachings. Moreover, rabbis in the centuries that followed the Crucifixion, formulated doctrines that were inimical to Christ, His Mission and His function in Creation and infixed them in the Talmud. The double standard ethic is endemic in Talmudic teachings. Thus, when medieval Christendom welcomed Jewish converts believing that they shared a common belief, a sort of "Judaeo-Christian" heritage, the indigenous peoples were soon disabused of this. For, the rancorous Jew soon let his feelings become known by his outward behaviour towards his Gentile neighbour. For, most Jews, believing themselves to be the elite of all tribes and that they were also "God's Chosen People," chose separateness and scorn as the response to Gentile goodwill. Moreover, they pushed for preferment in all things, especially in self-regulation of their communities. In many places they were even permitted Talmudic self-governance by Christian authorities, only being called to the greater laws of the state for extraordinary crimes. Consequently, within the segregated communities, a favourable environment was fostered whereby "the Jews" could enact double standard, self-serving laws to the detriment of the Gentile lawmakers and citizens. A situation that progressively isolated the Jewish communities and brought upon "the Jews" increasing Gentile enmity. A situation described by several modern Jewish intellectuals such as Jacob Katz, who suggests that: "The belief that Jewish law was of divine origin, whereas Gentile law was purely a human invention, linked any evaluation with the most fundamental theological tenet of Judaism. The moral conduct of the Jew towards Gentiles, if it was not to be determined solely by expediency and prudence, could have been influenced only by principles derived exclusively from Jewish sources." Another Jewish intellectual, Ehud Sprinzak, describes the traditional Jewish perspective on the surrounding Gentile "law of the land" in Eastern Europe thus: "Everyone knew everybody in the [Jewish community], and there was no need for official code or written law. The only formal law was the Torah and its halakhic interpretation as understood by the local rabbi ... It was a basis communal conduct ...['You help me, and I'll you'] ... The attitude towards the formal law of the land was suspicion... One has to survive it, not respect it. The art of Jewish survival within the ghetto included an elaborate system of using, avoiding, and sidestepping the [Gentile] law." Yet another, James Yaffe, describes it thus: "The feeling of separation ... leads to a special Orthodox morality. Ultimately because the moral value of every act is determined by halakhah, by Jewish law, they develop a rather cavalier attitude toward 'gentile' law. For example, a tiny minority of Hasidim [in America today] engage in jewelry smuggling. In the shtetl [Jewish Eastern European village] this was a traditional trade. Nobody looked upon it as a crime, because nobody recognized the existence of national borders; the only borders that mattered were those that divided the Jewish from the Gentile world." The wilful, self-imposed isolation of "the Jews," their insistence upon insular self-governance, and the speaking of Yiddish or Hebrew and the practice of Talmudic religion combined to set them apart from their Gentile neighbour. And so, to set their face continually against their host. This was exacerbated by the Jewish belief in themselves as a race apart, who would not assimilate, who believed themselves a race within a race, and who worked to bring about the Jewish Messianic Kingdom on Earth. Thus, the historical phenomenon of the rancorous Jew. The rancorous Jew who plotted and schemed to bring about self-enrichment at the expense of the Gentile but who, in the process, thought he furthered the cause of World Jewry and its One World Ambition and thus, somehow, does the "will of god." Mutual hostility arose between the Christians and "the Jews" who were separated by a huge spiritual gulf and whose only significant intercourse between them was commerce. A field in which "the Jews," despite their small numbers, were rapidly becoming pre-eminent. Especially by creating amongst themselves and the disparate communities of the so-called "Diaspora" the transcontinental network of contacts that greatly facilitated trade and commerce. Nevertheless, more importantly, they were also beginning to perfect and make grand the hated Usury that would soon ensnare kings, nobles, subjects and entire nations. Hebrew and Yiddish were languages that were impenetrable to most Gentiles and for centuries, rabbinical dictate forbade the teaching of Hebrew to Gentiles. The use of these strange "secret" languages tended to heighten Gentile suspicions of "the Jews." The seemingly glorious isolation of the Jew in his community, insulated from the Gentile, his laws and his God promoted the double standard mentality, whereby the ethical treatment of Jews by Jews was very different than that meted out by "the Jews" to the Gentiles. Jacob Katz describes it thus: "No moral teaching could change the realities of religious rivalry, social segregation, and the plurality of legal systems. All these must have encouraged a double standard of behavior. Those who were reluctant to be guided by the higher morality had the letter of the law on their side." "The letter of the law" is, of course, the wicked human construct called the Talmud and other attendant Jewish teachings, which Katz wrote, "are far from forming the elements of a universalistic ethic. They took social duality for granted." This is a less honest way of saying that Jews routinely interpreted the Talmud and its attendant teachings to sanction the exploitation of gentiles. Max Weber (1864-1920) the Gentile German sociologist and pioneer of the analytic method in sociology wrote this on the point of Jewish bigotry in business and their use of sharp practice in dealings with the gentile: "The economic behaviour of the Jew simply moved in the direction of the least resistance which was permitted them by [their] legalistic ethical norms. This means in practice that the acquisitive drive, which is found in varying degrees in all groups and nations, was here directed primarily to trade with strangers [i.e., non-Jews], who were usually regarded as enemies." The Jewish writer Bernard Weinryb describes the situation in medieval Poland: "... the limitations upon non-Jews [by Jewish law and culture] were ... stringent. Being outsiders in the Jewish community they were subject to all the prescriptions applying to foreigners. Thus Jewish middlemen and agents were forbidden to put one non-Jewish businessman in contact with another or to bring a non-Jewish consumer into a non-Jewish store. Many warnings were issued to such agents against showing non-Jews 'how to do business' or divulging Jewish business secrets to him ... Jews were forbidden to rent a room to a non-Jew ... Another area controlled by the Jewish community was rents and leaseholds. In time ... monopolistic tendencies increased among the Jews ... The fact remained that the monopolistic-exclusion principles were also an integral part of the Jewish way of life and could thus not be regarded as a constant anti-Semitic factor directly solely against themselves." Eva Hoffman, another modern Jewish scholar, writes of the Jew in Poland: "... that the Jews had their views of the people among whom they lived we cannot doubt, but their ordinary opinions, ideas, and preconceptions are largely inaccessible to us, since almost no secular Jewish literature is extant for the early period. We do know, however, that Jews had their exclusionism and monopolistic practices, prohibiting rights of residence to outsiders in their quarters, and strictly guarded certain business practices and 'secrets' from non-Jews ... We can take it for granted, moreover, that fierce religious disapproval traveled both ways [between Jews and Poles] ... At the same time, unlike other minority groups, Jews had no wish to assimilate, to take on the coloring of the surrounding culture, to become like the other." Heinrich Graetz usually referred to as the foremost Jewish historian of modern times, has this to say on the Jews of Poland and their regard for their hosts:
The Jacob-Esau tradition is often used as a metaphor for the skulduggery of the Jew in his dealings with the Gentile, whereby Jacob, the Jewish cheater and deceiver, is lionised in the Jewish tradition. Israeli professor Jay Goren writes: "As we may recall, Jacob the tent dweller, who used his head, outsmarted Esau, the skilled hunter, who uses his hands, and cheated Esau out of his inheritance, Isaac's blessing. The blessing was the birthright of Esau by virtue of his being the firstborn child. In Jewish tradition, Jacob came to symbolize the Jews and Esau the Gentiles. Thus, an image of contrasting roles were formed whereby the Jews were supposed to use their heads and the Gentiles their muscles." Another Israeli author, Israel Shahak argued that Orthodox Judaism is by its very nature: "... a combination of hypocrisy and the profit motive [of] duplicity and venality … It is actually true that the Jewish religious establishment does have a strong tendency to chicanery and graft due to the corrupting influence of the Orthodox Jewish religion." The influential German idealist philosopher, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), merely reiterates so many other commentators on the Jewish community and its relations with the gentile:
The French Jewish socialist and Zionist, Bernard Lazare, put the case for the special treachery of the Jew thus:
Ashkenazi Jews of course brought this ethic to Britain, to America, to Canada, to Australia, to South Africa, in fact, everywhere the "Diaspora" landed, especially on the coattails of the British during their empire building. For instance, as Jewish commentator James Yaffe notes: "The Lower East Side [the turn-of-the-century Jewish section of Manhattan] pushcart peddler who prided himself on his honesty wouldn't hesitate to sell damaged goods to the Gentile housewife." Similarly, we find this duplicity in the autobiography of Mary Antin, a Jewish immigrant to the United States from Russia, called The Promised Land in which she observed that: "[Jewish merchants and money lenders] preyed upon [Christians], and our shopkeepers gave false measure. People who want to defend the Jews ought never to deny this. Yes, I say, we cheated the Gentiles whenever we dared, because it was the only thing to do ... Is not that the code of war? Encamped in the midst of the enemy, we could practice no other. A Jew could hardly exist in business unless he developed a dual conscience, which allowed him to do to the Gentile what he would call a sin against a fellow Jew." Max Weber, the German sociologist, termed this historic Jewish quality, this duplicity, as "the dualistic nature of [Judaism's] in-group and out-group moralities." Modern Jewish apologists attempt to deny that the ancient enmity and secret rancour of the Jew for the Gentile exists and attempt to defend the indefensible. Especially the copious examples of the traditional Jewish double standard of morality. For example, the attempt by Jules Carlebach to equate Jewish outrages with the actions of autonomous states, notwithstanding the fact that the Jew, wherever he may have been, was a subject of a sovereign nation with its own laws. "If an independent political state adopted legislation which is intended to further the interests of its citizens, but which has no parallel provisions in neighboring states, then it is both logical and essential to create a dual system." Throughout history the growing menace of Jewish usury was perceived by men who understood instinctively the threat it posed to the future wellbeing of Western Christian Civilisation. Our ancestors soon understood the menace of Jew usury as an instrument of control within their nation. For instance, the "Magna Carta" signed at Runnymede in 1215 by King John under duress from his barons specifically addresses this problem. The main grievance redressed by the Magna Carta was the king's policy of extortionate taxation and financial plunder of his subjects. It also addressed the free Englishman's rights to trial by jury, Habeas Corpus, no arbitrary search and seizure, and equality before the law. Articles ten and eleven of the Charter addressed usury and gave protection against foreclosure by ruthless usurers: "10. If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond. 11. And if anyone die indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with the holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving, however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching debts due to others than Jews." The authors of the Magna Carta were acutely aware of the threat of Jewish usury to the wellbeing of their nation. Hence, as the subsequent centuries slipped by it came to pass that banking and usury became synonymous with Jewry. And that is exactly what the subtle Evil genius behind the Great Conspiracy desired: the Jewish race was to be the vehicle whereby nations became enslaved by usurers that owed allegiance, not to their host nation, but to the Dark Gods who are Lucifer and Ahriman (Satan). Thus the Jewish race (the ordinary members of it) are the unwitting pawns of the Great Conspiracy, repeatedly betrayed by their elite to the Evil Principalities that are ruled by the Dark Gods who are Lucifer and Ahriman (Satan). The creeping menace of Jewish usury to the wellbeing of the Gentile nations has been highlighted by numerous commentators: not out of malice or mischief, but simply because it is true. Here is a sample of an inexhaustible supply of writings and comments on the phenomenon of the menace of Jewish usury to the Gentile and his nation. Diodorus Siculus, the first century BC Greek historian who lived in the times of Julius Caesar and Augustus, had this to say on the point of usury and its use by the Jews: "Usury" is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates. This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles. It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!"
"The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious." The great German theologian Martin Luther (1483-1546), who led the Reformation, is quoted in Table Talk of Martin Luther as saying this:
Pope Clement VIII (1693-1769) lamented that: "All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor. Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live." Francois-Marie Arouet, better known as Voltaire (1694-1778), the French writer who was the embodiment of 18th century Enlightenment wrote that: "They [Jews] are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race." (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771). Rulers where not unknowing of the growing menace within their kingdoms: Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), the Corsican who became Emperor of the French, stated in Reflections and Speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806, that the Jews are: "... the carrion birds of humanity ... are a state within a state. They are certainly not real citizens ... The evils of Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of these people." Maria Theresa (1771 - 89), Queen of Hungary and Bohemia, understood the rancour and discord emanating from the Jew: "Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible." Nicholas I (1796-1855), Czar of Russia, understood the creeping menace of Jewish usury in his realm and the attendant impoverishment of his people. In his diaries we find that: "The ruin of the peasants in these provinces are the Zhids ['Yids', 'Kikes']. They are full- fledged leeches sucking up these unfortunate provinces to the point of exhaustion." In a book called Adam and Cain by William N. Murray, former Governor of Oklahoma (1951), the Shadow Government of America, the Anglo-American establishment whose exoteric expression is the Council on Foreign Relations, was alluded to when he wrote this: "Mr. W. Smith, who was for many years private secretary to Billy [William Ashley] Sunday, the Evangelist, makes a statement on oath before a Notary Public of Wayne, Michigan. The statement is to the following effect: President Coolidge shortly before his term of office expired, said publicly that he did not choose to compete again for the Presidency of the United States. Shortly afterwards, Billy Sunday interviewed him. Coolidge told him that after taking office, he found himself unable to carry out his election promises or to make the slightest move towards clean government. He was forced and driven by threats, even murder-threats, to carry out the orders of the Jews. Billy Sunday made public this statement of Coolidge. There followed a general attack upon the Evangelist. Then his son was framed and committed suicide, whilst the father's death was hastened in sorrow for the loss." People who are elected into political office soon meet with the Shadow Government, the Invisible Government of America and the Western World, the real power in the world, and either accepts it or is horrified by it. John Haylan, ex-mayor of New York City, spoke of the Shadow Government, the Anglo-American Establishment whose exoteric expression is the Council on Foreign Relations, in Chicago and was quoted in the New York Times (March 27, 1927). "The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today, for the real menace of our republic is this Invisible Government which like a Giant Octopus sprawls its slimy length over the city, STATE AND NATION. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen. It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers and every agency created for the public protection. It squirms in the jaws of darkness and thus is the better able to clutch the reins of government, secure enactment of the legislation favorable to corrupt business, violate the law with impunity, smother the press and reach into the courts. To depart from mere generalizations, let say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States Government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as well be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. They connive at centralization of government on the theory that a small group of hand-picked, privately controlled individuals in power can be more easily handled than a larger group among whom there will most likely be men sincerely interested in public welfare. These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government."
Captain Henry Hamilton Beamish founded a patriotic society called The Britons in 1919 and created the Britons Publishing Company with the aim to publish vehemently anti-Jewish tracts including The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. In speech in New York (October 30, 1937) Beamish described the extent of the Jewish control of the precious metals trade: "The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably pollute." The growing menace of Jewish usury and the future safety of the world's nations as sovereign entities free of indebtedness to Jewish usury was known to any percipient observer of history. Leicester Fitzgerald Charles (1784-1862), the 5th earl of Harrington, who is best known as a worker with Lord Byron in the cause of Greek independence, also opposed the admission of Jewish immigrants to England. In a speech in the House of Lords, July 12, 1858 he in formed the House he did so because: "They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world ... The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the greatest enemies of freedom." Mark Twain the American writer and humorist best known for his novels about Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, had certain opinions on the Jews that were far from wry. Twain was the nom de plume of Samuel Langhorne Clemens (1835-1910) whose honest assessment of the "Jewish Problem" has, as is the case with many famous writers and others sharing these convictions, been airbrushed from history. Twain's essay called "Concerning the Jews" appeared the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & other Stories, which after his death his publishers were instructed to delete. The essay appeared in Harper's Monthly Magazine (September 1899) and it included these observations on this most weighty of world problems: |
"It is really time to give up once and for all the legend according to which the Jews were obliged during the European middle ages, and above all 'since the Crusades,' to devote themselves to usury because all others professions were closed to them. The 2000 year old history of Jewish usury previous to the Middle Ages suffices to indicate the falseness of this historic conclusion. But even in that which concerns the Middle Ages and modern times the statements of official historiography are far from agreeing with the reality of the facts. It is not true that all careers in general were closed to the Jews during the middle ages and modern times, but they preferred to apply themselves to the lending of money on security. This is what Bucher has proved for the town of Frankfort-on-the-Maine, and it is easy to prove it for many other towns and other countries. Here is irrefutable proof of the natural tendencies of the Jews for the trade of money-lenders; in the Middle Ages and later we particularly see governments striving to direct the Jews towards other careers without succeeding."
"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves" 
"The Talmud has been the banner which has served as a rallying sign to the Jews, dispersed in diverse countries; it has maintained the unity of Judaism … The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of twelve volumes; it posies absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms, without any figure of speech, a world of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws. The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian
"
"The moral charge of the anti-Semite
Thomas Aquinas, the 13th century scholastic philosopher in his On the Governance of the Jews he wrote:
"But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them."
| 
|
